Child pages
  • Comparing Sakai Display Technologies
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Information

This page contains info and comparisons of the various Sakai compatible display technologies.

What do we want out of a display technology?

  • Easy to use for the developer
    • well structured, low learning curve, good documentation
  • Good separation of Code and UI
    • easy to use for the UI designer, can change templates without changing code and vice versa
  • Good integration with Sakai
    • portal, widgets, tools, etc...

What display technologies can we use in Sakai?

  • Virtually any Java related display technology can work in Sakai
    • However, there are some caveats
      • Sakai uses a special Servlet to handle redirects and processing of HTTP request variables
      • Portal and widget interaction have to be developed for each technology
  • What about non-Java tech?
    • Things that can connect to Java code via some kind of bridge (like Ruby or PHP) can be used but good integration is unlikely

Current Sakai Display Technologies

ComparativeDisplayTechnologies.ppt - Powerpoint on Comparative Display Technologies

Key:

(tick)=Yes/Good

(info)=In middle/Sorta/Neutral

(error)=No/Bad

(plus)=Positive

(minus)=Negative

Java Servlets

(error) Easy for Developer - Difficult to work with since everything must be done manually
(error) Separation of Code and UI - Code and HTML are mixed in one Java file
(error) Integration with Sakai - No real integration with Sakai other than the fact that it is functional

Other notes:

(info) Almost all Java based web technologies are based on Servlets
(info) Tried and tested technology (1997) with strong community and docs
(info) Pure Java code
(minus) HTML is placed in the Java class, impossible for UI designers to work with
(minus) Development this way is painful and slow compared to more modern methods
(info) Average AJAX/Javascript integration

Velocity

(tick) Easy for Developer - Good docs and fairly easy to get started using it
(info) Separation of Code and UI - Separation is mediocre and not easy for UI designers to work with
(tick) Integration with Sakai - Currently good but is not really being worked on much anymore

Other notes:

(info) Decent docs and community
(info) Most used display technology in Sakai
(minus) New development in Velocity is discouraged by the community, mostly carried over from CHEF
(info) Average AJAX/Javascript integration

JSP

(tick) Easy for Developer - One of the easiest technologies to pick up and start using
(error) Separation of Code and UI - Code and UI are mixed together in one file, no separation but does resemble html
(error) Integration with Sakai - No real integration with Sakai other than the fact that it is functional

Other notes:

(plus) Dynamic Java web content scripting language, similar to PHP
(plus) Can be changed without restarting the server
(info) Well tested technology with large community, excellent docs, and many books
(minus) Compiled when accessed which can cause a noticeable delay when accessing a page for the first time
(minus) Has many of the same weaknesses that other scripting languages have
(info) Average AJAX/Javascript integration

JSF

(error) Easy for Developer - High learning curve and diffcult to work with and get used to
(error) Separation of Code and UI - Does not use HTML in templates and can include code with the UI, hard to work with for UI designers
(tick) Integration with Sakai - Has widgets and best integration with Sakai (currently) that is being kept up to date

Other notes:

(info) The second most used display technology in Sakai (after Velocity)
(info) MyFaces and Oracle ADF Faces (other JSF implementations), pretty good docs and books
(minus) Pretty heavyweight and has problems in the current version
(minus) Poor AJAX/Javascript integration
(minus) Does not work with browser navigation

RSF

(tick) Easy for Developer - Learning curve is moderate but is easy to use once familiarity is gained
(tick) Separation of Code and UI - Excellent separation of Code and UI, uses pure XHTML templates
(info) Integration with Sakai - Current average but improving rapidly, new widgets being developed

Other notes:

(plus) Good docs and code samples available on the RSF Wiki
(info) Greater separation of UI and code can require more files and lines of code
(info) Not used in Sakai core yet but is fully functional in it and integrates somewhat
(minus) Small user community, no books yet
(minus) Still in development
(plus) Good AJAX/Javascript integration

  • No labels