Child pages
  • 3-11-2009 Conference Call

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Michael will release a concept document in the next weeks (after the board retreat).
  • We need a new process to share our requirements with developers.
  • Kate: IU has a process.
    • Attachment to this page.
    • FRC: Staff from teaching centers, IT, make a list of top priorities, forward to OPC
    • OPC: Faculty, Students
    • Getting the new LMS at par with the old one was the first big task.
    • List of known issues, post workarounds.
    • Surveys
    • IU is looking at Mneme, Samigo, BlogWow!, SCORM compliance, copy and paste from Word.
    • Back and forth with developers.
    • Decide which tools need more design work.
    • Dev team make estimate, send it to OPC.
    • Leadership is key. Buy-in from higher management.
    • User-driven, not dev-driven.
  • Josh: How should we address long-term, strategic vs. short-term fixes?
  • Kate: David Goodrum could join us to discuss this.
  • Josh: Problem with smaller institutions pushing their requirements to institutions with developers (IU, Michigan, Cambridge, etc.).
  • Robin: How would this new process fit with what's happening right now (Jira)?
  • Josh: Last effort has had limited results.
  • We have to start from what has been done last time. Refresh the list.
  • Robin: Top 5 list process has been done already too.