Child pages
  • Concepts of an evaluation workflow
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Contents

Concepts of an evaluation workflow

So, what are the primitives from the evaluation domain? What are these atomic step that will enable us to compose evaluation and review processes from?* An evaluation workflow can consist of the four following phases:

  • Working phase
    • Work
      The student(s) is/are working on the work item, he/they can save work as many times as he/they like.
    • Review
      The student(s) is/are still working and asked for comments and other input from fellow students, teachers and/or other contributors,
  • Evaluation phase
    • Submit
      The student(s) has/have (in his/their opinion) finished the work, and submitted the work item for evaluation.
    • Evaluate
      One or more evaluators (coaches, teachers, etc.) will evaluate the work and assign it a score.
    • Grade
      The evaluators have assigned a scored that will lead to the grade of the work.
    • Done
      The work item has been evaluated and graded. Both the work item and the evaluation will remain unchanged.

Open questions related to evaluations

  • What are these basic workflow steps for an evaluation centric workflow?
  • How do they affect the status of the work item?
  • What phases can be defined (wherein multiple steps can take place) in an evaluation workflow?
  • Are comments bound to a phase in the workflow?
  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. work in progress

    What would an evaluation process look like all chopped up in steps?

    • The student starts to work on the assignment in the matrix by placing work items in the cell.
      The workflow starts

      guard condition

      none

      status

      from none to work

      actions

      none required

    • Later the student continues to work by adding forms and other evidence of his competences.

      guard condition

      none

      status

      work

      actions

      none required

    • The student sends a request to a fellow student for review on his work.

      guard condition

      none

      status

      work

      actions

      send review request

    • The student really can't wait for the review of his fellow student, he needs to submit has work for evaluation now!

      guard condition

      none

      status

      work to submitted

      actions

      1. determine first/next evaluator,
      2. the evaluator is assigned,
      3. evaluation request needs to be send

    • Evaluator 1 receives a notification with an evaluation request and does his evaluation. Student's work looks examplary. He fills out an evaluation based on student's work and gives a score.

      guard condition

      are more evaluations required? Yes

      status

      submitted

      actions

      1. determine first/next evaluator,
      2. the evaluator is assigned,
      3. evaluation request needs to be send

    • Evaluator 2 receives a notification with an evaluation requestand does his evaluation. Student's work looks examplary. He fills out an evaluation based on student's work and evaluator 1's evaluation. Student's work looks examplary and evaluator 1's evaluation is appropriate, gives the definitive score and approves.

      guard condition

      are more evaluations required? No

      status

      submitted to evaluated

      actions

      apply grading regime to the definitive score.

    • Evaluator 2 approves the grade and returns the graded work to student

      guard condition

      The last evaluator approves the calulated grade or gives an alternative grade.

      status

      evaluated to done

      actions

      1. apply definitive grade.
      2. send notification to the student.

    • The student reads combined evaluation from evaluator 1+2.

      guard condition

      none

      status

      done

      actions

      none required