Functional Review and Recommendations

Added by Mark J. Norton, last edited by John Norman on Mar 26, 2005  (view change)

I recently completed a functional reviw of Sakai and made some recommendations about where could take the project. This material attached as a full report and as a PowerPoint presentation.

  • Mark Norton
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.

Comments (4)

 

  1. Mar 25, 2005

    Mara Hancock says:

    As long as you are listing roles,...

    As long as you are listing roles, I think there really should also be a vertical box next to Software Developers (under the tool projects and WGs) that represents the User experience reps (Interaction designers and Instructional designers and Faculty). Perhaps, you should just take out the Software developer box all together and assume the teams will be created independent of the larger structure.

  2. Mar 25, 2005

    John Norman says:

    I'm not sure I understand what assumptions are behind this picture. Are we sayin...

    I'm not sure I understand what assumptions are behind this picture. Are we saying the Architecture Team and Tools team continue unchanged under SEPP-2? Does this mean Michigan and Indiana will continue to commit current staffing levels beyond the end of the project?

    1. Mar 27, 2005

      Mark J. Norton says:

      Not completely, unchanged, John. My view is that the Tools, Architecture, and QA...

      Not completely, unchanged, John. My view is that the Tools, Architecture, and QA teams are "vision holders" for Sakai that span particular releases. I anticipate that the composition of these teams will change over time to include passionate members of the Sakai community outside of the original contributors.

      The review is a functional analysis. It largley talks about what Sakai does and how it could do them in the future. There are no requirements on who staffs it, but there is a need for work to get done and someone will have to do it. Already, this is changing and we are starting to see people from outside of the core-4 making signficiant contributions, including CARET!

  3. Oct 28, 2005

    Anonymous says:

    hi

    hi